Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀúÀÛ È¿À² ¹× ±¸°­°Ç°­°ü·Ã »îÀÇ Áú Æò°¡

Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency and Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 35±Ç 2È£ p.135 ~ 147
ÀÌ¿ë½Â, º¯¿µ¼·, ÃÖÁ¾ÈÆ, ¾ÈÇüÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¿ë½Â ( Lee Yong-Seung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
º¯¿µ¼· ( Byun Young-Sub ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÁ¾ÈÆ ( Choi Jong-Hoon ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
¾ÈÇüÁØ ( Ahn Hyung-Joon ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÃÖ±Ù Sato µîÀÌ °í¾ÈÇÑ mixing ability index(MAI)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ Áß ÅëÁõÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ±º°ú ¹«Å뼺 °üÀýÀâÀ½ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ±ºÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °´°üÀûÀÎ ÀúÀÛ È¿À²À» Á¤»óÀÎÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ ´ëÁ¶±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ°í, ÁÖ°üÀûÀÎ Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀÎ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¹ý Áß¿¡¼­ À½½Ä¼·Ãë°¡´ÉÁö¼ö(Food Intake Ability Index, FIA)¿Í ÀúÀÛ ´É·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ°üÀû Àνĵµ Æò°¡(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀúÀÛ È¿À²À» Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ±¸°­°Ç°­°ú °ü·ÃµÈ »îÀÇ ÁúÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ Oral Health Impact Profile(OHIP)-49K ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ý °£ÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°í, ¶ÇÇÑ ÅëÁõ±º¿¡ À־´Â Ä¡·á ÈÄ ÅëÁõÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀúÀÛ È¿À²ÀÇ º¯È­ ¾ç»óÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. MAI, FIA, VAS´Â ÅëÁõ±ºÀÌ Á¤»ó±º¿¡ ºñÇØ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °üÀýÀâÀ½±ºº¸´Ùµµ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© ÅëÁõ±ºÀÌ Á¤»ó±º°ú °üÀýÀâÀ½±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀúÀÛ È¿À²ÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(P£¼0.05). °üÀýÀâÀ½±º¿¡¼­´Â MAI, FIA, VAS¿¡¼­ Á¤»ó±º°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 2. ±¸°­°Ç°­°ü·Ã »îÀÇ Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¹®ÁöÀÎ OHIP-49KÀÇ °æ¿ì Á¤»ó±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ÅëÁõ±º°ú °üÀýÀâÀ½±º ¸ðµÎ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© ±¸°­°Ç°­°ú °ü·ÃÇÑ »îÀÇ ÁúÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. Àüü ´ë»óÀÚ(71¸í)¿¡¼­ °´°üÀû ÀúÀÛ ´É·Â Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀÎ MAI¿Í ÁÖ°üÀû ÀúÀÛ ´É·Â Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀÎ FIA¿Í VAS°£¿¡´Â ¼­·Î À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(P£¼0.01). OHIP-49K¿¡¼­µµ MAI¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í ¸ðµÎ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 4. °üÀýÀâÀ½±º¿¡¼­´Â FIA¿Í VAS¿¡¼­¸¸ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç(P£¼0.01), ÀÌ¿ÜÀÇ ¸ðµç Ç׸ñÀº »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 5. °¢ Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ý °£ÀÇ »ó°ü¼º¿¡¼­ FIA¿Í VAS´Â Àüü ´ë»óÀÚ, ÅëÁõ±º, °üÀýÀâÀ½±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 6. ÅëÁõ±º¿¡¼­ Ä¡·á Àü¿¡ ºñÇØ Ä¡·á ÈÄ ÅëÁõ °¨¼Ò¿Í ÇÔ²² VAS¿¡¼­´Â Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Áõ°¡ ÇÏ¿´´Ù(P£¼0.05). ¹Ý¸é¿¡ MAI¿¡ À־´Â ÀúÀÛ È¿À²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ FIA, OHIP-49K¿¡¼­µµ Ä¡·áÀü°ú ÈÄ ÅëÁõ °¨¼Ò¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯È­´Â ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̹ø ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀúÀÛ È¿À²À» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°´Â ÁÖ¿äÀÎÀº ÅëÁõÀ̸ç, °üÀýÀâÀ½Àº ÀúÀÛ È¿À²À» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ¾Æ´ÏÁö¸¸ »îÀÇ ÁúÀ» ÀúÇϽÃÅ°´Â ÇÑ ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀúÀÛ È¿À²À» °³¼±½ÃÅ°±â À§Çؼ­´Â ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î ÅëÁõÀ» Ä¡·áÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡Àå Áß¿äÇϸç, »îÀÇ ÁúÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÅ°±â À§Çؼ­´Â ÅëÁõ»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °üÀýÀâÀ½¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü¸®µµ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

In this study, the objective masticatory efficiency of two groups of temporomandibular disorder patients, pain and sound groups, was compared with that in a normal group using the MAI (mixing ability Index). The subjective chewing ability was evaluated using questionnaires, such as the Food Intake Ability Index (FIA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-49K of the patients was also examined to measure the oral health-related quality of life. The results were as follows: 1. The MAI, FIA and VAS in the pain group were significantly lower than in the normal and sound groups. This shows that the chewing efficiency of the pain group was lower than the normal and sound groups (P£¼0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the sound and normal groups. 2. The OHIP-49K for the oral health-related quality of life showed a significant increase in both the pain and sound groups compared with normal group. This means that the oral health-related quality of life was lower in both the pain and sound groups. 3. There was a correlation between the MAI, FIA and VAS (P£¼0.01) in all subjects (71 persons). The OHIP-49K was associated with the FIA and VAS. 4. There was a correlation between the FIA and VAS (P£¼0.05) in the sound group but no correlation in the other groups. 5. There was a correlation between the FIA and VAS in all groups. 6. The VAS was increased significantly in the pain group according to the level of pain reduction after treatment (P£¼0.05). However, there was no significant increase in the MAI, even though there was an improvement in masticatory efficiency. In addition, there was no difference in the FIA and OHIP-49K according to the level of pain reduction after treatment. In this study, it is believed that pain is a main factor decreasing the masticatory efficiency in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Moreover, TMJ sounds decrease the quality of life but do not decrease the masticatory efficiency. Therefore, it is important to control the pain in order to improve the masticatory efficiency in temporomandibular disorder patients. Moreover, managing both pain and sound can improve the quality of life.

Å°¿öµå

±¸°­°Ç°­°ü·Ã »îÀÇ Áú;À½½Ä¼·Ãë°¡´ÉÁö¼ö;ÀúÀÛ È¿À²;ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö
Food intake ability Index;Masticatory efficiency;Mixing ability Index;Oral health-related quality of life;Temporomandibular disorder

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI